Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clients not John's Letter Highlights
12-24-2017, 09:40 PM (This post was last modified: 12-24-2017 09:40 PM by davephx.)
Post: #1
Clients not John's Letter Highlights
I am writing in regards to a recent article in the Bay Area Reporter in which you were quoted about efforts to address sex work in San Francisco.

I assume you did not do this out of any malicious intent, and that it was simply a matter of not being aware of the politically correct term, but I noticed a quote from you in which clients of sex workers are referred to as "johns", and wanted to let you know that this terminology is considered offensive by many sex workers and our clients.

We want our clients to be called clients, just as the clients of other professionals are, and not by a slang or "street" term which is demeaning and implies that they are all men, which is not the case. As a sex worker, I have clients who are female, transgender, and couples, as well as men. Please avoid use of the term "john" in future public comments!

I also wanted to emphasize that the overwhelming majority of us do this work by choice, preferring it over the other options realistically available to us, just as is the case for most people in most occupations.

By and large we do not need special protections from our clients or managers, or yet another government program, but simply for our work to be decriminalized so that we can go to the police without fear in cases where someone is threatening or abusing us.

There is a growing consensus among human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, LGBT groups like Lambda Legal and the Transgender Law Center, and others, that the criminalization of prostitution violates human rights, and there is a federal court case (ESPLERP v. Gascon) right now working its way through the courts to overturn California's anti-prostitution law on Constitutional right-to-privacy grounds.

Meanwhile there is no community consensus behind any outreach or program that operates from the premise of most sex workers, clients, or managers being victims, criminals, and/or minors. These are dangerous and offensive stereotypes not based on reality. As our 2008 ballot measure Proposition K showed, nearly 42% of San Franciscans favor decriminalizing prostitution entirely. In your district, of course, the number was not 42%, but much higher. So we would like your support as a supervisor to be a true leader and push for decriminalization, and to seek an end to the futile and harmful police sting operations that cannot and will not solve the problems created by prohibition.

The reality is that the overwhelming majority of people who trade sexual services for money, or vice-versa, are consenting adults who are harming no one.

Our greatest needs are to be protected from legal persecution, and for members of the public to learn to respect and tolerate us as their friends, neighbors, family members, etc., rather than reacting with fear, bigotry, intolerance, or misguided paternalistic attempts to "help" us against our will.
((( starchild )))
Sex Workers Outreach Project / Erotic Service Providers Union

Promoting Intimacy and Positive Sexuality with honesty and integrity
Esalen massage - integrating with one another in love -"heartfelt touch"
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact UsPhoenix ListReturn to TopReturn to ContentLite (Archive) ModeRSS Syndication
is part of:
Copyright © 2009
The information on this page may not be reproduced or republished on another webpage or website but you may link to it